In my personal twittersphere, there has been an undercurrent of dissatisfaction with being unfollowed by certain people in certain circles. Okay, specifically Brad J. Ward, a young gun who is a very focused wiz and entrepreneur. I myself have been followed by, then met in real life, then unfollowed by this guy, so I understand why others in the same circle might be miffed. Today Brad wrote a post about how he uses Twitter and you should read it. Yeah, it’s like everything else Brad does: it’s serious, it’s intense, it comes with charts and graphs, and is pretty much waaaay over the top in trying to explain why he has unfollowed people. But it is also a really good description of how he uses this social media platform, and it closes with a great question: How do you use Twitter? In fact, it has me so fired up that, despite the fact I have a huge amount of work to do today, I feel a pressing need to answer the call to respond. While Brad makes some very good points, he is dead on: the way he uses twitter is not the way I use twitter.
Why I Use Twitter
I am what you call a connector. I link people to people, and I tend to be spread over a number of communities because I am a generalist, so there’s a lot of crossover that I do each and every day. This means my community is large, and varied, and has many different facets of interest. I love this. I get a lot of input from people and learn amazing things, useful links, and in general, learn more about how these people think, work, and play. Once I connect with you, I tend to stay connected to you. So much so, that I also find it gets overwhelming at times. Twitter is a fabulous tool, and it allows me to keep abreast (no giggling, and yes I know who you are) of what my peeps are doing. Social media has enabled me to engage multiple people from multiple walks of life, and my life, work and play are likewise enriched with their knowledge, their outlook, and their connections.
How I Use Twitter
First, I use Twitter to connect with people. That’s a given. Any event I’ve been to has introduced me to any number of people that I still follow, because they are wicked smart/silly/cool/friendly. Second, I use Twitter to learn. See @zeldman, @mollydotcom, @beep, @stop, @meyerweb. These people inspire me, but they don’t know me. But they provide an absolute wealth of information in design and it’s a good bet that I own at least one book they’ve written. Third, I use Twitter as a knowledge base. I am in higher ed, and man, those people RAWK the house. There are the edupunks (@jimgroom, @cogdog @colecamplese) and the visionaries (@opencontent @zephoria, @mwesch) and those leading the cause of social media in higher ed (@markgr, you are The Man). And then there are all the people I meet at work, on the road, at events, on the internets. Many of these people I know well, or have met and forged a friendship (you know who you are; insert @yourname here). Holy smokes they are smart. And fourth, I use Twitter as entertainment (@wilw, @TerryBorder, @FakeAPStylebook, @donttrythis) as well as many of my peeps with their own alter ego accounts. That really sums it up in a nutshell.
But remember:
I am a connector. For me, people come first. Because of this, I am a high follow cost; I tweet a lot, and I respond to others within conversations. I ask questions, I comment on posts. I choose not to use punctuation to proceed @replies, because I rely on Twitter’s default position: if you follow the account to whom I am replying, you can see the tweet. If you don’t, you won’t. Honestly, I throw enough stuff out of my own that I don’t need to throw more junk into your twitterstream (okay, to me it isn’t junk, but to you it likely is. Or, you would already be following that person. Or unfollowing me. See my logic here?) There are times when my life is slow, and when that happens–or when I’m avoiding doing something else–I look at someone’s personal twitter stream to see who they are talking to. Sometimes I pick up great leads; sometimes, I’m just snooping. Either way, it gives me a peek into another thought process, and I can decide if there is value there on my own without throwing everything into the twitterstream.
Why I Might Not be Following You
I do not automatically follow everyone who chooses to follow me. (Gasp!) I know. A shocker. Honestly, I have a very loyal spambot following. But they come, then The Great Purge happens, and they depart. I do check to see if there is some connection, or else they talk to me, or they talk to people I know. Then I follow. And sometimes? Sometimes I unfollow:
- You’re a spambot
- You haven’t used your twitter account in over a year, and you obviously don’t intend to start now
- You constantly retweet someone else I’m following, without offering your own insight and value
- You’ve gotten on a soapbox that’s not my soapbox
- I’m just not that into you
Okay, anyone who is reading this, relax. You obviously aren’t on that list. But if I’ve unfollowed you, you might be on this list. I might be following you elsewhere and you just don’t realize it:
- You prefer another platform
- I’m following your rss feed
- I’m following you on someone else’s list, who obviously put greater thought into it than I did, and I hate duplicating effort.
Like Brad Ward, for example. He is Very Focused on his business, and that’s not my business. So he is off the radar (not because it is tit for tat; it really is because we don’t share enough common ground). Does that mean I can’t stand the bum? Not at all. We’re still connected on Facebook, and I’d be happy to see him at conferences, and I would certainly hope we’d hang out for at least a drink. (Dude, you’re buying the first round.) But as far as his unfollowing me is concerned, I understand. Where once the unfollow might have bothered me, it really doesn’t anymore, and for many of the same reasons Brad lists.
Message Redundancy
The more mainstream Twitter gets, the more platforms that want to connect with it. Cross-posting is great, but it can get redundant very quickly. Therefore I caution you to choose wisely, and don’t cross post everywhere. Facebook was first, but now everybody’s doing it; LinkedIn just proudly announced that it, too, has jumped on the bandwagon. I may not update that as often as I should, but I don’t view it as a truly “social” platform. Your mileage may vary. But I do think there is a value to crossposting, if you use it wisely. For example: I hate Facebook. (Gasp!) Really, I do. It’s not my preferred platform (or, in the lexicon of the great philosopher, Austin Powers, it’s not my bag, baby). However, many people want to connect with me there. So I’m there. But I don’t obsessively check Facebook like I check Twitter. Instead, for those who prefer that platform, my Facebook updates are my Twitter updates. I can easily see why someone who is more Facebook friendly–like Brad–would hate to see my tweets twice. So far it hasn’t bothered me enough to change it. If that’s where you want to follow me, so be it.
Going Mobile
I now have an iPhone, and while I’m not followed by a zillion (okay, 3100+) people like Brad is, it can be a lot to scroll through. I totally rely on Boxcar to push any replies and direct messages to me (my CrackBerry, by the way, did this without help, and I was stunned when I discovered my iPhone needed assistance to do so). This app helps me respond to people who reach out to me while I’m on the go. In fact, several people DM me as opposed to texting, because they can be 90% certain that I’m either in arms reach of my laptop or my phone. I find this greatly amusing, but highly likely to get my attention.
TweetDeck
I started using TweetDeck as a desktop application because I needed to create groups of people, largely for things like work, or design, or play. I know there are others that do groups — I believe Seemic and CoTweet are probably the top two. All three also do multiple twitter accounts and, while I currently don’t handle more than my personal account, I suspect that will change soon. I also create a hashtag search for any event in which I’m participating (whether live or from a distance) just so that I can follow along with the backchannel. Often times I find new people to follow, and I love this about twitter. But without the ability to search and group, I would miss much in my twitterstream because of that pesky little thing we call life. Oh yeah, and the day job. Don’t forget that.
Twitter Lists
And now we come to the latest iteration of being chosen last for 5th grade kickball. Personally I love lists. They do what I’ve been using TweetDeck for. There are times where a different focus in the day requires different groups for me to interact with. Lists are simply an extension of that thought process. The down side is that you can also see how many people have you on a list, and if you aren’t on (m)any, then you feel like me in 5th grade, because I really didn’t kick that damned ball very well. Also, people tend to think that if they have a connection on Twitter, they should be on at least one of their lists. If they don’t, hurt feelings can result. Or, worse, being on the fabled “ignore but can’t unfollow” list. Ouch. Dude, you’re doing it wrong. There’s a little thing called a privacy setting: you either make it public (all can see) or private (no one but you can see). I have slowly (too slowly, and for that I apologize in advance) been putting people into the appropriate groups so that I can better use our connections to do what I do. In my mind, everyone I am following falls into one of these lists. I know they can see them, and I know they will find themselves listed somewhere. There are also private lists. By me. For me. Not as badges of honor for others to gloat/weep over, but because these are the VIPs whose tweets I cannot afford to miss. This is the list I follow because I want/need to see any tweets from these people, not just the ones that have to do with me. In Brad’s case, it would probably be family. And his business partner. And I suspect @tsand, because he’s just that funny.
The point here, folks, is that like any other technology, Twitter is a tool. And as I like to say, use the tool, don’t be the tool. I am obviously guilty of leaping before I look and putting my foot in my mouth; I do it about once every other week. So I’m a slow learner. Unfollow me. That is your perogative. Twitter can be effective, but only if you use it in a way that works for you. And my way isn’t your way. I focus on people. You may be much more focused on using Twitter to promote your business. I’m not so focused on limiting my follows to a specific number, because I think that’s very random. Some people insist on a Certain Number of Follows. Period. That’s cool for you. It is what it is. For me, it’s about the connections. That’s the special sauce, folks (holla, @kprentiss!).
Aaaaaaand, I’m spent. So I’m off my soapbox with a shout out and thanks to Brad for being the unknowing foil to my post. I now need to go back and read the comments to his post, because I read first and immediately went into my own response before anyone else had commented. I think it’s a great topic. So in turn, I ask the same question that Brad asked on his: How do you use Twitter?
I disagree with this entire rant, except for the part where you say @tsand is funny. And the part where you caught me giggling at your use of abreast.
I kid, nicely done and in a wicked prompt manner. How long has this post been sitting around as a “draft” in your posts folder? 🙂
You got me, I giggled. What!?! I make no apologies.
I do question…did anyone actually think we all use social tools the same way?
Oh, and I’m mortally offended that you didn’t mention me specifically and in triplicate. That is all.
First, thanks for being specific and not beating around the bush. Not that I would ever expect that from you. 🙂 Thanks also for joining me in the “too much work to be blogging” camp, but still making it happen. It’s a timely discussion and you’ve greatly enhanced it.
I opened TextEdit and am just going to type my thoughts as I go. Ready? Rock.
Re: being a connector, have you ever tried Klout.com? According to Klout:
“Bradjward is a persona. You have built a personal brand around your identity. There is a good chance that you work in social media or marketing but you might even be famous in real life. Being a persona is not just about having a ton of followers, to make it to the top right corner you need to engage with your audience. Make no mistake about it though, when you talk people listen.”
(I’d be interested to see if Klout looks at you as Connector, Casual, Persona or Climber.)
Love your explanation of why we are not ‘Twitter compatible” but are Facebook friends. And yes, the first round is on me. 🙂
You totally pegged me on the List of Joe, Howard and @tsand. It also includes @epsteada, and it’s called Totes Magotes. (http://twitter.com/bradjward/totes-magotes). I have a private list called clients, and a new list of family and IRL friends. But again, until this functionality is introduced to mobile, it’s not of value to my lifestyle.
Not sure why I picked 200. It just felt right. It’s like the packet that gets the intervention… you have to have a goal at first. I made that my goal. I’ll undoubtedly creep back up towards the 750-1000 mark, but this time I will be much more conscious about who I follow.
In closing, you rock. Glad we’ve met, glad we’re connected (facebook style), and looking forward to knowing you better.
🙂
Brad
Awesome, awesome, awesome. First time reader, long time fan. 🙂
Again – we do all use platforms differently. Maybe the sting comes from which is your primary…?
Excellent food for thought(s)…
@jesskry
I’m on one of Brad’s lists that also includes @tsand? And @fjgaylor? And @howardkang? This won’t end well when one of us gets the boot. 😉
@tsand: Thanks! Sadly, I didn’t even have this in a draft folder. This post has been rattling around in my brain for a long time, and when I read Brad’s post, I literally couldn’t wait on it; it opened the floodgates (I was in transit) and I had to find a place to stop and capture the thoughts into some semblance of order before they made a mess in my car. 🙂
@Shelley: I think that people lose sight of the forest for the trees. The thing I love about social media is that social aspect that connects us. The thing I hate about social media is that social aspect that excludes us. We’ve seen it in the whole follow/unfollow crowd divider, and now we have lists where *I* think we’re tight, but I’m hurt you don’t have me on a list that says so for others to see. I’ve been a renegade element for a long time, and I’m used to not being a part of the cool kids club. My thing is that we have to remember that THIS IS ONLY A TOOL TO HELP US CONNECT. Or do business. Or whatever it is that we do. I like to think of it as going to the party, and I hang out with this group for a while, but then I casually sidle over to another group, and then the group in the corner has someone laughing REALLY LOUDLY (oh wait, that’s me) and I have to go see what’s up. I’m engaging with most everyone there, but in many different ways. As for you, you are indeed on my private HAWT list. That is all.
@Brad: First and foremost, thanks for understanding that this post is NOT about “bashing Brad”; it really was ignited by your post which touched on something I’ve obviously been thinking about for some time. Thanks also for being good enough to respond in kind. And yes, I’ve used Klout. As you might suspect, Klout does categorize me as a Persona, and by their definition (listed in your comment), I would agree. For the record, their definition of Connector is as follows:
Connector – You are a constant source of information to your friends and co-workers. There is a good chance that you probably introduced several of your friends to Twitter. Your taste and opinion is respected and your judgment is trusted.
Now, I really wouldn’t go far enough to say my taste and opinion is respected, and I DEFINITELY laugh about my judgment being trusted; however, as an educational technologist, my job is to help people use the right tools for the job. That might be connecting them with the right technology, or the right ideas, or the right people. In that way, I still argue that I am a connector, but somehow my sparkly personality got in the way. 🙂 As long as we all understand that there is actually a chewy nugget of value at the center, then we’re good.
In terms of your follow number of 200, to me that is an abstract, but I will agree that there is a certain number of follows that is the right balance of being able to filter the stream and still engage with your audience. I tend to go through mine and whittle them down every so often, but what usually gets the boot are the social media/design/tech resources, because I end up subscribing to their rss feed instead. My number is a bit high right now, and I feel weeding process will begin soon (although using groups means the number I actively follow is significantly less, and contributes to added lag between weedings). I also consider it a self correcting process: When the noise gets to be too much, I go through and decide where the noise is coming from, and how to get that info without drowning out the rest of the twitterstream. As we’ve said, you’re mileage may vary, and that’s the beauty of social media. Thank you for your kind words. The second round is on me.
@Jess: If I could fave your “First time reader, long time fan” comment, I *so* would. That is shiny, Cap’n! I also agree that we use the platforms differently, and I constantly struggle to find the balance. I have friends who are relatively low tech and new to the social media thing; they only Facebook, and I have to be careful about that. Because I hate Facebook. I hate the apps, I hate the games, I hate the effort it takes to stay involved with everyone. I just don’t have the time to commit to it. I’m also wary of exposing my family to others who may or may not know them. But when my Facebook only friends comment on a post, I make sure to comment back to them, so they don’t feel as though I’m not connecting because I’m not interested. I’m just not interested in the tool they’ve chosen to connect with. They basically dragged me kicking and screaming to be more active on my Facebook account (I’ve had it for _years_), and I have. Not my preference, but that’s okay. It is what it is.
@Adam: The thing that thrilled me about you is that our first time meeting was in a hotel lobby because you tweeted out that you had just arrived and was sitting there hanging. We’d never met before, and yet we sat down and started talking like friends. I thought that was great, and it is typifies what I love when social media meets in real life–the instant recognition and continuation of conversations that began online. Of course, you have a lot of pressure staying in that “totes-magotes” list; all I can say is glad I’m not you. 😉
Thank you everyone, for your comments. Really, you guys RAWK. (And yes, I’m eying you up, @shelleyKeith. HAWT.)
June 10, 2008 – the day I “got” twitter.
You (and your great PSU colleagues) showed me the light at the social media workshop that day. This workshop was one of the best I’ve been a part of and one of the many things I learned that day was how to frame my own personal approach to using Twitter. I had been on Twitter for a long time but never was able to derive value.
For me, Twitter is about “water cooler” conversations with professional colleagues. It is the most valuable social media platform I have to connect with my peers and benefit form the wisdom of the crowd. @NikkiMK said it best earlier this year: “Twitter has redefined the word co-worker”.
The other thing I did immediately after that conference was set up a 2nd Twitter account for my personal life. This has allowed me to keep the @markgr account on point and hopefully improve the signal to noise ratio.
Moving forward, I am going to be interested to see how the technology evolves to deal with information overload. We need better tools to aggregate the information that interests us, and then filer the signal from the noise. (See Clay Shirkey’s takes on “Filter Failure”).
Finally, I couldn’t agree more with Brad on the importance of family and work/life balance. And with that, I’m off to play with Kohl, who can’t wait to come to the PSU conference next year!
@Mark: I love that we continue to explore Twitter and how our use of it continues to change and adapt. I like the way you phrase it: water cooler conversations with professional colleagues. That is a great way of looking at it, and really my primary use of it. Nikki and I have talked in depth about how our coworkers include all of you, and I even have a slide in one of my presentations that shows just how many educational institutions I’m connected to through the power of social networking (specifically, Twitter). Yes, the challenge now is to filter so we can maintain those connections. As always, priorities matter. My way of making family first? I totally disconnect from the ethers, and focus on the real life relationships. We all do what works best for each of us. Thanks for weighing in on this discussion.
And scratch Kohl’s ears for me — I can’t wait to meet him in person next year!
Twitter is great for the following:
1 – Share and receive timely information or announcements.
2 – bringing more traffic to your blog or website.